![]() ![]() An online database of EFT research lists more than 100 clinical trials ( A psychophysiologic intervention, EFT draws from 2 established therapies: CBT and exposure therapy. 9, 10 Authors of all 3 meta-analyses used the APA standards as their quality-control criteria when selecting studies for inclusion. Two other systematic reviews with meta-analyses, 1 for anxiety (14 RCTs) and 1 for depression (20 RCTs and within-subjects studies), found “large” treatment effect sizes of 1.23 and 1.31, respectively. Compared with eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) and cognitive behavior therapy (CBT), no significant treatment difference was found, indicating similarities in efficacy between the 3 treatments. The meta-analysis found a large treatment effect, with a d of 2.96 when EFT was compared with normal care. 8 It used the Cohen difference, an appropriate effect size for the comparison between 2 means, in which 0.2 indicates a treatment effect, 0.5 indicates a moderate treatment effect, and 0.8 indicates a large treatment effect. It found that “Criteria for evidence-based treatments proposed by Division 12 of the American Psychological Association were also applied and found to be met for a number of conditions, including PTSD.” 1Ī systematic review and meta-analysis of 7 studies of EFT for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) was recently reported. 7 A systematic review searching the scientific literature until April 2012 found 51 studies of EFT and allied methods collectively referred to as energy psychology. When proposing its own standards, the US Food and Drug Administration contemporaneously set a similar standard of 2 RCTs for drug trials. ![]() 1– 3 A minimum of 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are required for a therapeutic method to be deemed “efficacious.” 1– 3 Studies are typically evaluated using criteria published by the American Psychological Association’s (APA’s) Division 12 Task Force on Empirically Validated Treatments, hereafter abridged as “APA standards.” 4– 6 The APA standards amalgamate current scientific consensus to identify 7 “essential” criteria that must be present for a study to qualify: randomization, sample size sufficient to establish statistical significance, a clear definition of the treatment population, valid and reliable assessments, blind interview assignments, a treatment manual, and sufficient data to allow the study’s statistical methods to be assessed for appropriateness. A number of systematic reviews consider the evidence for Emotional Freedom Techniques (EFT) as an “evidence-based” practice. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |